IP Courses Lecture Site

Aspects of choosing a legal form

The choice of legal form is a fundamental decision that determines the legal, economic, and organizational structure of a company. It influences how responsibility is distributed, who makes decisions, how high the risk is, and how the company presents itself to the outside world. A conscious examination of these aspects forms the basis for a stable and legally secure corporate structure.

Several people decide to start a business together: an investor contributes capital, three craftsmen have practical experience in various trades in the construction industry, and an engineer develops innovative technical concepts. Together, they want to manufacture modular, energy-self-sufficient micro-houses—compact living solutions that can be operated completely independently with solar energy, water recovery, and digital control. The investor wants to limit his risk, while the craftsmen and the engineer want to be actively involved in production and development. Another person is to take over the commercial management and control strategic planning.

The structure of a company determines its internal organization, decision-making processes, and distribution of responsibility. It determines whether all parties involved participate directly or whether certain bodies—such as the management or executive board—take over the management. A clear structure facilitates management and creates transparency, while flexible forms promote personal cooperation and rapid decision-making.

For the founders, the question arises as to how the internal structure of the company should be organized and who should have which decision-making powers. The investor contributes capital but may not want to be involved in day-to-day operations. The question arises as to whether he should still have a say in key strategic decisions. The three craftsmen take care of the practical implementation, but expect to have a say in production issues. The engineer is responsible for technical development and may want to make independent decisions about innovations. The business economist contributes business management expertise and could take on overall coordination or commercial management. Together, they must clarify whether decisions are to be made unanimously, by majority vote, or according to areas of responsibility—and whether a managing director or a collective management body is to be appointed and how the management is to be controlled.

The entrepreneurial character is characterized by participation in economic transactions with independence, the intention to make a profit, and permanence. It determines whether the provisions of corporate law apply, for example with regard to accounting. However, certain legal forms can also be chosen in non-entrepreneurial constellations, for example in asset management.

In the case of the founding community, the situation is relatively clear: they want to jointly develop, produce, and distribute energy-self-sufficient micro-houses – in other words, they want to develop a long-term, profit-oriented activity. This clearly fulfills the characteristics of an enterprise.

Legal capacity describes the ability to be the bearer of rights and obligations. It determines whether a company can conclude contracts, acquire property, and be liable for damages independently and separately from its shareholders. The question of legal capacity is also decisive in determining whether the company or its members can act legally in relation to third parties.

For the construction and sale of micro-houses, it is advantageous to have a corporate entity that can act independently and conclude contracts. Such a company with legal capacity can act vis-à-vis customers, suppliers, and authorities, enter into obligations, and acquire rights. This means that the question of legal capacity and the appropriate form of company becomes the focus of further consideration for the founders.

Management encompasses the leadership, administration, and control of the company. It regulates who makes internal operational decisions, who bears strategic responsibility, and the relationship between management and ownership. Depending on the legal form, management can be delegated to the shareholders themselves or to appointed bodies. Clear responsibilities promote efficiency and prevent conflicts.

As far as day-to-day business is concerned, the founding community believes that the business economist should have the final say. They have the business expertise and the necessary overview to make commercial, organizational, and financial decisions. This clear leadership role ensures consistency in the management of the company and avoids contradictory decisions in day-to-day business. However, the other founders retain influence over the fundamental direction of the company through regular consultations or control mechanisms.

External representation determines who is authorized to commit the company to third parties. It determines who is allowed to sign contracts and perform legally binding actions. The power of representation is crucial for legal certainty in business transactions, as it creates trust and clearly assigns responsibility for external decisions.

The founding community must decide who is authorized to conclude contracts on behalf of the company—for example, with suppliers, banks, or customers. Since not all founders involved can or should represent the company externally at the same time, it must be clearly regulated who legally represents the company externally. It may also be advisable to hire a managing director or manager who is entrusted with operational management and legal representation. This ensures that day-to-day business is conducted efficiently, while the shareholders themselves make strategic decisions and retain control. A clear regulation of the power of external representation prevents misunderstandings and protects the company from unwanted obligations, but also gives third parties the certainty that a contract with the company has been legally concluded.

Liability determines who is responsible for the company's liabilities and to what extent. It is one of the most important factors in choosing a legal form, as it determines the personal risk of those involved. While some legal forms provide for unlimited liability, others limit the risk to the company's assets. This choice influences courage, security, and financial planning.

In the case of the founding community, all parties involved are aware that liabilities may arise. It is important to the parties involved to limit their personal liability risk. The craftsmen, the engineer, and the business economist want to contribute their labor and expertise without being liable with their entire private assets. The investor also wants to protect his investment and avoid being personally liable for operating debts. A structure is therefore sought that makes it possible to seize economic opportunities without putting the existence of any individual founder at risk in the event of losses or major damage.

Sole proprietor

The sole proprietor is a simple and very common form of entrepreneurial activity. This legal form is characterized by an uncomplicated structure and low start-up costs. Sole proprietors act entirely in their own name and at their own risk. This legal form is particularly suitable for smaller businesses, freelancers, and start-ups with a clear decision-making structure.

The structure of a sole proprietorship is simple and straightforward. There is no legal separation between the entrepreneur and the business—the two form a single entity. All operational decisions are made by the entrepreneur personally, which allows for a high degree of flexibility. At the same time, this concentration of responsibility leads to a strong personal attachment of the business to the owner.

The business is established when business activities commence – no separate act of incorporation or partnership agreement is required. However, depending on the activity, a business registration or official approval may be necessary. There is no general obligation to register in the commercial register; this only becomes relevant if the business meets the requirements of a commercial enterprise.

The status of entrepreneur arises automatically from the activity. As soon as the business activity is independent, economic, and permanent, the person is considered an entrepreneur. The sole proprietor thus acts as an independent legal entity in commercial transactions and is subject to the provisions of corporate law, especially in the case of a commercial enterprise.

The sole proprietorship has no legal capacity of its own. From a legal perspective, the entrepreneur is identical with the company. He concludes contracts in his own name, acquires rights, enters into obligations, and is personally liable. The company itself can therefore neither sue nor be sued—this is always done by the entrepreneur himself.

Management is entirely in the hands of the entrepreneur. He is solely responsible for planning, organizing, implementing, and controlling operational activities. This self-determination enables quick decisions and a clear strategic orientation, but also means that the entrepreneur cannot delegate responsibility and bears all operational burdens himself.

The sole proprietor represents himself in business transactions. He concludes contracts, conducts negotiations, and acts as a contractual partner. Third parties only act on his behalf if they have been expressly authorized to do so – for example, as employees with signing or acting authority. Representation is therefore simple, but completely tied to the person of the entrepreneur.

A key feature of this legal form is unlimited liability. The sole proprietor is liable with their entire private and business assets for all liabilities of the company. This personal liability significantly increases the risk, but also offers creditors a high degree of security. Anyone operating as a sole proprietor should therefore realistically assess financial risks and, if necessary, hedge them with insurance or reserves.

Civil law partnership

A civil law partnership (GesbR) is the simplest form of association between individuals for the pursuit of a common purpose. It is particularly suitable for temporary or manageable projects where a simple, flexible structure is sufficient. The GesbR is a basic form of partnership that has no legal personality of its own, but is based on the personal legal relationship between the parties involved.

The GesbR is geared towards the direct cooperation of the partners. It is formed when at least two persons enter into a contract to promote a common purpose. There is no legally prescribed organizational structure, no governing bodies, and no formal decision-making mechanisms. Agreements are usually made by mutual consent; trust and cooperation are central.

A GesbR is formed informally by agreement between the parties involved. A written contract is not mandatory, but is recommended in order to clearly define rights and obligations. There is no requirement to register the company in a public register, nor is there any obligation to comply with specific formalities for its formation. The company is formed by the agreement of the partners to pursue a common purpose.

The GesbR can be both entrepreneurial and non-entrepreneurial. If it engages in permanent economic activity, the provisions of corporate law apply. In other cases, it serves, for example, the joint management of assets, scientific cooperation, or private projects without the intention of making a profit. Its entrepreneurial status therefore depends on its specific purpose and actual activity.

The GesbR has no legal personality of its own. The legal entities are exclusively the partners themselves, who act in their own name, acquire rights, and enter into obligations. Legal transactions are therefore not concluded by the company, but by the partners. In the event of liability, only the persons involved—not the GesbR as such—can be held liable.

The management of the business is generally the responsibility of all partners jointly. Decisions are made by mutual agreement, unless otherwise provided for in the partnership agreement. However, contractual agreements may transfer management to individual partners in order to facilitate the process. This personal involvement of the parties involved has a particular impact on the management of the GesbR.

Since the GesbR does not have its own legal personality, it cannot act externally on its own behalf. Contracts are concluded on behalf of the individual partners, who act as a joint entity. It must be clearly recognizable to third parties who the partners are, as they become direct contractual partners. The power of representation arises exclusively from mutual authorization or agreement.

The partners are liable for all obligations of the GesbR personally, directly, and without limitation. Liability is joint and several, which means that each partner is liable for the entire debts of the company. Creditors are free to choose which partner to claim against. Internally, the parties involved can agree on compensation arrangements, but externally, joint and several liability remains.

The GesbR is a simple and flexible form of cooperation that is particularly suitable for smaller ventures or temporary projects. It does not require formal establishment and allows for individual structuring. At the same time, the lack of legal personality and unlimited personal liability mean a higher risk for those involved. The GesbR is therefore ideal when trust, simplicity, and cooperation are paramount—but less so for larger, high-risk ventures.

Partnership

A partnership (OG) is a partnership characterized by close cooperation between its partners. It is particularly suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises where personal involvement, mutual trust, and shared responsibility are paramount. At least two people join forces to pursue a common economic purpose.

The structure of the OG is based on the personal involvement and shared responsibility of the partners. All parties involved are actively involved in the management of the company and make joint decisions on important matters. The company is strongly people-oriented: trust between the partners forms the basis of the cooperation. The internal organization can be flexibly structured through the partnership agreement, but remains fundamentally based on partnership.

An OG is formed by concluding a partnership agreement between at least two partners. This agreement regulates rights, obligations, and decision-making structures. Only upon entry in the commercial register does the OG come into existence as a legal entity. Registration is mandatory and marks the beginning of legal existence and entrepreneurial status. The formation is thus more formalized than in the case of a GesbR, but simpler than in the case of corporations.

The OG is engaged in business activities if its activities are of a commercial nature – i.e., if they are independent, long-term, and aimed at economic success. Entry in the commercial register does not establish entrepreneurial status, but merely documents and confirms the existence of the OG to the outside world. Only when it takes up commercial or economic activities does the OG act as an entrepreneur in the legal sense.

The OG has legal capacity and can therefore establish independent rights and obligations. It can acquire property, enter into liabilities, sue and be sued. This distinguishes it from a civil law partnership (GesbR), which does not have its own legal personality. Legal capacity strengthens its position in business transactions and enables it to act as an independent contractual partner.

The management of the OG is generally the joint responsibility of all partners. They are obliged to actively manage the business and represent the company in its day-to-day operations. The partnership agreement may also transfer management to individual partners in order to simplify decision-making processes. Management in the OG is based on mutual trust and coordination, which underlines the personal responsibility of each individual involved.

The partners represent the OG in legal transactions. They conclude contracts, assume obligations, and act on behalf of the company. According to the basic legal principle, all partners have sole power of representation, unless the partnership agreement stipulates otherwise. The power of representation may also be restricted or transferred to individual persons. This clearly regulates who is authorized to make binding declarations on behalf of the company.

A key feature of the OG is the unlimited and joint liability of the partners. Each partner is liable with their entire private and business assets for the liabilities of the company. Creditors can therefore hold each individual partner liable for the entire debt (joint and several liability). Internally, compensation arrangements can be agreed, but externally, liability remains undivided. This arrangement requires a high degree of personal trust, but offers creditors a high level of security.

The OG is a partnership-structured, legally capable partnership based on trust and personal responsibility. It is easy to set up and allows for flexible internal organization, but it entails a considerable personal liability risk. It is particularly suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises in which all parties actively participate and share responsibility.

Limited partnership

The limited partnership (KG) is a partnership characterized by a combination of personal involvement and capital-based participation.

Its essential feature is the separation between partners with unlimited liability (general partners) and those with limited liability (limited partners).

This structure allows entrepreneurial responsibility and capital participation to be combined in one type of company.

The KG consists of two groups of partners: general partners manage the business, represent the company externally, and have unlimited liability. Limited partners contribute capital but are excluded from management and have limited liability. This clear division of roles creates a balance between control and risk, as the general partners bear operational responsibility while the limited partners act primarily as investors.

The KG is therefore particularly suitable for businesses in which entrepreneurs want to involve investors without giving them influence over management.

A KG is formed by concluding a partnership agreement between at least one general partner and one limited partner. The agreement specifies the purpose, contributions, and internal rights and obligations. The KG only becomes a legal entity once it has been entered in the commercial register; the limited liability of the limited partners also only takes effect at this point. Formation therefore requires formal steps, but is less complex than for corporations.

The KG is entrepreneurially active if it engages in an independent, long-term economic activity. Entry in the commercial register documents this entrepreneurial status to the outside world, but does not establish it. Entrepreneurial responsibility lies primarily with the general partners, who manage the operational business and represent the company in the market. Limited partners participate economically without being entrepreneurs in the narrower sense.

Like a general partnership, a limited partnership also has legal capacity. It can acquire rights, enter into obligations, sue and be sued. It thus acts as an independent entity in legal transactions, independent of the persons of its partners.

This characteristic enables the KG to conclude contracts in its own name and to act legally as an independent economic operator.

The management is the sole responsibility of the general partners. They manage the day-to-day business, make operational decisions, and are responsible for the economic success of the company. The limited partners are generally excluded from management, but may be involved in certain cases by special agreement or power of attorney. Their consent is required for extraordinary transactions, such as amendments to the partnership agreement. This system ensures efficiency without blurring the liability structure.

Externally, the KG is represented by the general partners. They act on behalf of the company, conclude contracts, and represent the company. Limited partners have no power of representation unless they are granted express power of attorney. The clear separation of powers of representation creates legal certainty for business partners, as it is always clear who is acting on behalf of the company.

The liability structure is the key distinguishing feature of the KG: general partners have unlimited liability with their entire private and company assets. Their position corresponds to that of a partner in an OG. Limited partners have limited liability – only up to the amount of their liability sum entered in the commercial register, provided they do not exercise any management authority or act beyond their power of representation. Initially, the company is liable with its own assets. Only if these are insufficient are the partners liable in accordance with their position. This liability system allows investors to be involved without them bearing a personal risk of insolvency.

The KG is a flexible partnership that combines entrepreneurial initiative and capital participation. It allows investors to be involved without transferring operational responsibility to them. While the general partners are liable with their entire assets and manage the company, the risk of the limited partners is limited to their investment. This makes the KG particularly suitable for family businesses, growing companies, and investment models in which risk and influence are to be deliberately separated.

Limited liability company

A limited liability company (GmbH) is a corporation and one of the most popular legal forms for businesses. It offers a clear separation between shareholders and management, as well as limited liability, which significantly reduces the personal risk for those involved. The GmbH is suitable for small, medium-sized, and large companies alike, as it combines legal certainty with organizational flexibility.

The GmbH has a clear, legally regulated structure with two central bodies: The shareholders' meeting is the highest decision-making body, consisting of all shareholders. It makes fundamental decisions, such as the appointment and dismissal of managing directors or amendments to the articles of association. The management runs the company's day-to-day operations and is responsible for implementing decisions.

A GmbH is established in several steps: First, a partnership agreement is drawn up. Once the share capital has been paid in, the company can be entered in the commercial register, thereby acquiring full legal capacity. Only with this entry does the GmbH come into legal existence, and only then does the limitation of liability take effect. The formation therefore requires more formalities than for partnerships, but offers significantly greater protection for the shareholders.

The GmbH is an entrepreneur by virtue of its legal form. This means that it is always legally considered an entrepreneur, regardless of whether it actually carries out any economic activity or not.

The GmbH is a legal entity and has full legal capacity. It can independently acquire rights, enter into liabilities, sue and be sued. The company acts independently of its shareholders; they are not contractual partners of the creditors. This legal independence makes the GmbH a separate legal entity in business transactions, separate from the private assets of its shareholders.

The operational management of the GmbH lies with the management, which is appointed by the shareholders' meeting. The managing directors run the company within the framework of legal and contractual requirements and are subject to the instructions of the shareholders. The shareholders' meeting determines the strategic direction, while the managing directors implement the day-to-day business. This separation ensures a clear division of tasks between control and operational management.

The GmbH is represented externally by its managing directors. They are authorized to conclude contracts on behalf of the company and to bind it legally. The scope of their power of representation can be regulated in the articles of association, for example through individual or joint representation authority. This clearly defines who represents the company in legal transactions, which ensures legal certainty and transparency.

The key advantage of the GmbH lies in its limited liability: In principle, only the company is liable for liabilities with its corporate assets. Shareholders are not personally liable if they have paid their contribution in full. Exceptions exist for managing directors if they violate legal obligations, for example in cases of breach of duty of care, mismanagement, or incorrect information. This limitation of liability protects the private assets of the shareholders and creates a high degree of economic security.

The GmbH is a legal entity with a clear separation between ownership and management. It offers limited liability, organizational stability, and flexibility in management. The higher start-up costs are offset by legal certainty and a professional image in business transactions. This makes the GmbH particularly suitable for companies seeking growth, investment, or risk minimization.

Stock corporation

The stock corporation (AG) is a corporation characterized by a clear separation between ownership and management. It is particularly suitable for larger companies or capital-intensive projects, as it offers the possibility of raising equity capital by issuing shares. The AG combines legal stability with the possibility of involving a large number of shareholders in the company.

The AG has a multi-level organizational structure with clearly defined responsibilities. The executive board manages the business independently and oversees day-to-day operations. The supervisory board monitors the management and controls the activities of the executive board. The annual general meeting: A meeting of shareholders decides on fundamental matters (e.g., capital measures, amendments to the articles of association, discharge of the executive bodies). This division ensures balance of power, control, and professionalism in the management of the company.

The formation of an AG requires the creation of articles of association, which define the purpose of the company, its capital structure, and its governing bodies, the raising of the share capital required by law (at least €70,000), and entry in the commercial register, which gives the AG legal capacity. Only upon registration does the company come into existence as a legal entity and may engage in business transactions. The formation process is complex, but it provides the basis for a legally secure and scalable company structure.

The AG is an entrepreneur by virtue of its legal form. This means that it is always legally considered an entrepreneur, regardless of whether it actually carries out any economic activity. Upon entry in the commercial register, it acquires legal capacity and can act independently on the market, conclude contracts, and enter into obligations. Its entrepreneurial status thus derives directly from its legal form as a corporation.

The AG is an independent legal entity with full legal capacity. It can establish rights and obligations, acquire property, sue and be sued. Its existence is independent of the fate of its shareholders – a change in shareholders has no effect on its legal identity. This independence ensures stability and continuity in business transactions.

Management is the responsibility of the executive board, which acts independently and manages the company on its own responsibility. The executive board makes operational and strategic decisions within the framework of legal requirements and the articles of association. It is subject to control by the supervisory board and is bound by the resolutions of the annual general meeting. This system ensures professional management and control, especially in large companies with many shareholders.

The AG is represented externally by the executive board. It has the authority to bind the company and to act in a legally binding manner. Its power of representation is generally unlimited, but may be restricted by the articles of association or by internal resolutions. This clear allocation creates legal certainty and ensures a uniform external image of the company.

Liability in an AG is strictly limited to the company's assets. The company is liable for its liabilities with its entire assets. The shareholders are not personally liable, but only up to the amount of their capital contribution. The management board can be held personally liable if it violates legal obligations, for example through mismanagement, incorrect reporting, or breach of duty of care. This liability structure promotes willingness to invest and protects shareholders from personal risk.

The AG is a legal entity with a clear separation of ownership and management. It offers an efficient organizational structure, clear control mechanisms, and limited liability. Its capital-raising capabilities make it particularly suitable for larger companies, expansive business models, and capital markets. The higher start-up costs are offset by legal certainty, scalability, and institutional stability.